Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist Certification (CAMS) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist Certification (CAMS) exam. Study with multiple choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Boost your chances of success!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What significance does FATF place on legal persons concerning money laundering laws?

  1. They are exempt from money laundering laws

  2. They should not be subjected to any compliance practices

  3. They should be included under the same considerations as individuals

  4. They are only monitored by their home countries

The correct answer is: They should be included under the same considerations as individuals

The significance that the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) places on legal persons in relation to money laundering laws is that they should be treated similarly to individuals. This reflects the understanding that legal entities, such as corporations or organizations, can be used as vehicles for money laundering and other financial crimes. By including legal persons under the same considerations as individuals, FATF emphasizes the need for regulations that apply to both. This includes requiring these entities to have robust anti-money laundering (AML) compliance programs, identification procedures, and transparency in their ownership structures. The rationale is that criminals often exploit legal entities to obscure the origins of illicit funds, thereby making it essential for the AML framework to extend to these entities to mitigate risks effectively. The other options suggest scenarios that do not align with FATF's stance. Legal persons are not exempt from money laundering laws; on the contrary, they are viewed as critical participants in efforts to prevent financial crimes. Additionally, these entities are indeed required to comply with AML practices, contrary to the notion that they should not be subjected to any compliance. Finally, the monitoring of legal persons is not limited to their home countries, as effective AML measures require international cooperation and oversight.