Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist Certification (CAMS) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist Certification (CAMS) exam. Study with multiple choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Boost your chances of success!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


How is 'Legal Risk' defined in the context of the Basel Due Diligence Principles?

  1. The risk of incurring financial losses only

  2. The risk of potential lawsuits or unenforceable contracts

  3. The risk associated with operational failures

  4. The risk of regulatory penalties only

The correct answer is: The risk of potential lawsuits or unenforceable contracts

In the context of the Basel Due Diligence Principles, 'Legal Risk' is defined primarily as the risk of potential lawsuits or unenforceable contracts. This definition encompasses the possibility that a financial institution could face legal actions due to non-compliance with laws and regulations, breaches of contracts, or other legal disputes. Legal risk extends beyond just the financial implications; it involves uncertainty in operating within the legal framework, which can affect the institution’s reputation and operational effectiveness. For instance, if an institution enters into a contract that is later deemed unenforceable, it could face significant financial implications, but the primary concern is the legal challenge itself and the potential for litigation. By focusing on the risk of lawsuits or unenforceable contracts, this definition highlights the importance of having thorough legal and compliance frameworks in place to mitigate potential disputes and maintain the integrity of the institution's operations. This contrasts with other options, which either narrow the focus to financial losses or penalties, or address operational failures, thereby not fully encapsulating the broader scope of what legal risk entails in this context.